Hamilton By-law 03-296, s. 12 — Should a court of competent jurisdiction declare any part or whole of any provision of this By-law to be invalid or of no force and effect, the provision or part shall be deemed to have been severed from this By-law, and it is the intention of Council that the remainder of the By-law survive and be applied and enforced in accordance with the terms to the extent possible under law
Last checked
Indexed text
Should a court of competent jurisdiction declare any part or whole of any provision of this By-law to be invalid or of no force and effect, the provision or part shall be deemed to have been severed from this By-law, and it is the intention of Council that the remainder of the By-law survive and be applied and enforced in accordance with the terms to the extent possible under law.
Short Title
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Topics
Related sections
- 10 Any Police Officer, Municipal Law Enforcement Officer, or employee of the City designated by the Director for the purpose of this Section is authorized to order any person believed by such Officer or employee to be in contravention of this By-law to desist from the activity consisting or contributing to such contravention
- 11 Any person contravening any provision of this By-law is guilty of an offence and upon conviction, is liable to such penalty as provided for under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter P.33, as amended
- 13 The short title of this By-law shall be "The Snow Removal By-law"
- 14 That By-law 88-152-S (Flamborough), By-law 86-77 (Hamilton) Section 7, By-law 4114-93 (Dundas), By-law 434-90 (Glanbrook), By-law 4477-96 (Stoney Creek), and By-law R77-109 (Regional Roads By-law) Section 7 be repealed
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.