Kingston By-law 2021-166, s. 18.2 — Where an Animal Control Officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence under this Bylaw has been committed by a Person, the Animal Control Officer may require the name, address, and proof of identity of that Person
Last checked
Indexed text
Where an Animal Control Officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence under this Bylaw has been committed by a Person, the Animal Control Officer may require the name, address, and proof of identity of that Person.
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Topics
Related sections
- 17.5 In accordance with Section 105 of the Municipal Act, 2001, if an Owner is required to Muzzle a Dog pursuant to Subsection 17.2 above, the Owner is entitled to request a hearing to determine whether or not to exempt the Owner in whole or in part from the requirement, provided that such request does not act as a stay of the Muzzling requirement
- 18.1 Part 18 - Obstruction
- 18.3 Failure to provide proof of identification satisfactory to an Animal Control Officer when requested to do so pursuant to Subsection 18.2. of this Bylaw shall constitute obstruction of an Animal Control Officer under Subsection 18.1. of this Bylaw
- 19.1 The following Schedules are attached to and form part of this Bylaw
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of the public bylaw page. The city's page governs.