Richmond Hill By-law 62-24, s. 2 — Subject to any applicable provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act, where the standards imposed by this By-law have, more than once, failed to exclude unauthorized entry, and further where the Owner's control, attendance or lack of security measures to protect the Heritage Property suggests that a more secure option be used, then the Owner shall supply such measures, including improved ------------------···--··-· The Corporation of the City of Richmond Hill security of openings, as may be required by a Municipal By-law Enforcement Officer
Last checked
Indexed text
Subject to any applicable provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act, where the standards imposed by this By-law have, more than once, failed to exclude unauthorized entry, and further where the Owner's control, attendance or lack of security measures to protect the Heritage Property suggests that a more secure option be used, then the Owner shall supply such measures, including improved ------------------···--··-· The Corporation of the City of Richmond Hill security of openings, as may be required by a Municipal By-law Enforcement Officer.
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Topics
Related sections
- 6.3 Vacant Heritage Property
- 1 Where a Heritage Property contains one or more Buildings that remain vacant for a period of ninety (90) days or more, the Owner shall ensure that
- 6.4 Conflict with Heritage Provisions
- 1 In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Part and any other provision of this By-law, the provision that ensures that the Heritage Property and Heritage Attributes are conserved shall prevail
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.