Richmond Hill By-law 740, s. 16.1 — Where an unlawful Sign is found on Private Property, the Property Owner or any occupant of the Property or Premises shall be presumed to have been the Person who unlawfully placed or erected the unlawful Sign, which presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary, on a balance of probabilities
Last checked
Indexed text
Where an unlawful Sign is found on Private Property, the Property Owner or any occupant of the Property or Premises shall be presumed to have been the Person who unlawfully placed or erected the unlawful Sign, which presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary, on a balance of probabilities.
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Related sections
- 15.16
- 16.0 PRESUMPTION
- 16.2 Where an unlawful Sign is found on Public Property, any Person named on the unlawful Sign and any officer or director of the Person, or any partner of the Person where the Person is a partnership, or any proprietor of the Person where the Person is sole proprietorship shall be presumed to have been the Person who placed or erected; and where no name appears on the unlawful Sign, but a telephone number appears, any Person whom the phone number is listed according to a telephone directory, shall be City of Richmond Hill Sign By-law Page 40 of 44 By-law No. 52-09 presumed to have been the Person who located, erected, or displayed the unlawful Sign, or to have caused or permitted the unlawful Sign to be located, erected, or displayed. The presumption herein may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary, on a balance of probabilities
- 17.0 INTERPRETATION
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.