Markham : Règlement no 2017-27, art. 8.7 — Where the minimum standard imposed by sections 8.3 and 8.5 has, more than once, failed to exclude unauthorized entry, and further where the Owner’s control, attendance or lack of security measures to protect the Vacant Heritage Property suggest that a more secure option be used, then the Owner shall supply such measures, including such improved security of closures, as may be required by a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer
Keep Markham Beautiful (Maintenance) By-law
Vérifié le
Texte indexé
Where the minimum standard imposed by sections 8.3 and 8.5 has, more than once, failed to exclude unauthorized entry, and further where the Owner’s control, attendance or lack of security measures to protect the Vacant Heritage Property suggest that a more secure option be used, then the Owner shall supply such measures, including such improved security of closures, as may be required by a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer.
By-law 2017-27
Extrait court. Le reste du texte est sur la source officielle.
Source officielle · Table des matières
Articles voisins
- 8.5
- 8.6
- 9.0 Abandoned Building/Vacant Listed Heritage Property
- 9.1 In addition to the minimum standards for the maintenance of a property, the Owner of an Abandoned Building shall protect the property against the risk of fire, storm, neglect intentional damage or damage by other causes by effectively preventing the entrance of the elements, unauthorized persons or the infestation of pests by boarding up and securing any openings to the Abandoned Building. For the purpose of securing an Abandoned Building provisions of subsection 8.3 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), and
Autres villes
Pour signaler une correction : info@bylawinsider.com. Ce lien ouvre votre programme de courriel.
Copie non officielle, pour faciliter la lecture. La version officielle prévaut. Source officielle
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.