Newmarket : Règlement no 2020-30, art. 9(6) — Animal Control By-law
Animal Control By-law
Vérifié le
Texte indexé
Where the Manager has reasonable grounds to believe that a Dog has engaged in a Dangerous Act against a Person or Domestic Animal, the Manager may impose the following with respect to such a Dog :
- (a) for the first (1 ) documented offence with a municipality, the Manage may serve the Owner of the subject Dog with a Notice to Muzzle;
- (b) despite Section 9(6)(a), if it is the Manager ’s opinion that the Dangerous Act is severe, serve the Owner of the subject Dog with a Dangerous Dog Order, requiring the subject Dog to comply with the requirements under Section 9(7) of this By-law;
- (c) for the second (2 ) documented offence with a municipality, serve the Owner of the Dog with a Dangerous Dog Order, requiring the subject Dog to comply with the requirements under Section 9(7) of this By-law; or
- (d)
Where the Dangerous Act occurred while the Dog was the subject of a Notice to Muzzle or a control order under the Dog
Owners Liability Act, serve the Owner of the Dog with a Dangerous Dog Order, requiring the subject Dog to comply with the requirements under Section 9(7) of this By-law.
Extrait court. Le reste du texte est sur la source officielle.
Source officielle · Table des matières
Sujets
Articles voisins
Autres villes
Pour signaler une correction : info@bylawinsider.com. Ce lien ouvre votre programme de courriel.
Copie non officielle, pour faciliter la lecture. La version officielle prévaut. Source officielle
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.