Richmond Hill : Règlement no 22-25, art. 3 — Responsible Pet Ownership and Animal Regulation By-law
Vérifié le
Texte indexé
3. Every Dangerous Dog Notice shall include:
- a) a statement that a Municipal By-law Enforcement Officer has reason to believe that the Dog is a Dangerous Dog;
- b) the restrictions that the Owner must comply with in accordance with section 5.2, and when such restrictions take effect; and
- c) a statement that the Owner may request a hearing with respect to the Municipal By-law Enforcement Officer's designation of the Dog as a Dangerous Dog and the restrictions with which the Owner must comply with, by providing a written request to the Director within ten (10) business days of receiving such Dangerous Dog Notice and paying the applicable hearing fee as prescribed by the Tariff of Fees By-law.
- d) A statement that a request for a hearing does not act as a stay of the Dangerous Dog Notice, nor its prescribed restrictions.
Extrait court. Le reste du texte est sur la source officielle.
Source officielle · Table des matières
Sujets
Articles voisins
- 1
- 2 Where a Municipal By-law Enforcement Officer has reasonable grounds to believe a Dog is a Dangerous Dog, a Municipal By-law Enforcement Officer shall serve the Owner with a Dangerous Dog Notice
- 4 Where the Owner of a Dog who receives a Dangerous Dog Notice from a Municipal By-law Enforcement Officer requests a hearing, a Hearing Officer shall hold a hearing pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, RSO 1990, c S.22, and the Hearing Officer may
- 5 The decision of the Hearing Officer is final
Autres villes
Pour signaler une correction : info@bylawinsider.com. Ce lien ouvre votre programme de courriel.
Copie non officielle, pour faciliter la lecture. La version officielle prévaut. Source officielle
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.