Richmond Hill : Règlement no 973, art. 973 — 9.10 FENCE - HE IGH T - DESCR IP T IO N 97 3.9.1 2
Vérifié le
Texte indexé
9.10 FENCE - HE IGH T - DESCR IP T IO N 97 3.9.1 2
Exemption - 76 Major Mackenzie Drive West Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a section of fence located in the front yard on the lot lines shall not apply to the property municipally know in the year 2003 as 76 Major Mackenzie Drive West, Part lot 46, Concession 1 W.Y.S. provided:
- Exemption - 60 White Lodge Crescent Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a section of fence located in the side and rear yards on the lot lines shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2003 as 60 White Lodge Crescent Plan 65M2439 PRT BLK 175 provided:
- Exemption - 18 Glenarden Cres., Plan 65M -2477 Lot 61 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a fence located in the side and rear yards and on the flanking lot line shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2004 as 18 Glenarden Crescent, Plan 65M-2477 Lot 61 provided:
- Exemption - 108 Larratt Lane, Plan 65M -2890, Lot 61 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a fence located in the side and rear yards and on the flankage lot line shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2004 as 108 Larratt Lane, Plan 65M-2890 Lot 61 provided:
- Exemption - 21 Elderwood Drive, Plan 65M-2586, Lot 198 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a gate and on the front lot line shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 200 4 as 21 Elderwood Drive, Plan 65M-2586 Lot 198 provided:
- Exemptio n - 153 Shaftsbury Ave, Plan 65M-2889, Lot 182 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a fence shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2004 as 153 Shaftsbury Avenue, Plan 65M-2889 Lot 182 provided:
- Exemption - 28 Ellsworth Ave, Plan 65R- 20137, Lot 103 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a privacy screen shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2005 as 28 Ellsworth Avenue, Plan 65R-20137, Lot 103, Part 2 provided that:
- R IC HM O ND HI L L 973.29 M A R C H 2007 Exemption - 550 Stouffville Rd, Plan 65R-22236, Lot 61 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of fence/privacy, screen/trellis shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2006 as 550 Stouffville Road, Plan 65R-22236, Lot 61 provided:
- Exemption - 85 Black Walnut Crescent, Plan 65R, Lot 22 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of fence shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2006 as 85 Black Walnut Crescent, Plan 65R-2797, Lot 22 provided:
- Exemption - 8 Kennington Court, Plan 65M -2375, Lot 15 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a fence shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2007 as 8 Kennington Court, Plan 65M- 2375, Lot 15: Exemption - 39 King’s Cross Ave Plan 65M-2585, Lot 56 Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a fence shall not apply to the property municipally known as 39 King’s Cross Avenue to permit an arbor structure over a backyard gate of the property as outlined in SRPRS.10.121. By-law 123-10, 22 November, 2010. Exemption -All of Denham Drive, 73 to 108 Westwood Lane Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a front yard fence shall not apply to any property on Denham Drive, and to those properties municipally known as 73 to 108 Westwood Lane, inclusive, to permit 1.82 metre (6 foot) high decorative metal fencing with stone pillar support structures in the front yards of the properties. By-law 86-21, 23 June, 2021.
Extrait court. Le reste du texte est sur la source officielle.
Source officielle · Table des matières
Sujets
Articles voisins
- 973.9.9 Exemption - 55 Oak Ave, Part Lot 259, Plan 1960E Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a section of fence located in the rear and side yards on the lot lines shall not apply to the property municipally known in the year 2002 as 55 Oak Avenue, Part lot 259, Registered Plan 1960E provided
- 973.9.9(a)
- 973(b)
- 973.9.10 Exemption - 76 Major Mackenzie Drive West Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the provisions respecting the permissible height of a section of fence located in the front yard on the lot lines shall not apply to the property municipally know in the year 2003 as 76 Major Mackenzie Drive West, Part lot 46, Concession 1 W.Y.S
Autres villes
Pour signaler une correction : info@bylawinsider.com. Ce lien ouvre votre programme de courriel.
Copie non officielle, pour faciliter la lecture. La version officielle prévaut. Source officielle
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.