Kingston By-law 2021-166, s. 17.5 — In accordance with Section 105 of the Municipal Act, 2001, if an Owner is required to Muzzle a Dog pursuant to Subsection 17.2 above, the Owner is entitled to request a hearing to determine whether or not to exempt the Owner in whole or in part from the requirement, provided that such request does not act as a stay of the Muzzling requirement
Last checked
Indexed text
In accordance with Section 105 of the Municipal Act, 2001, if an Owner is required to Muzzle a Dog pursuant to Subsection 17.2 above, the Owner is entitled to request a hearing to determine whether or not to exempt the Owner in whole or in part from the requirement, provided that such request does not act as a stay of the Muzzling requirement.
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Topics
Related sections
- 17.3 An Animal Control Order pursuant to Subsection 17.1(a) shall be in effect for a period of no longer than two (2) years from the date it is issued, or the outcome of any court decisions rendered through the Dog Owners' Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D.16, as amended or replaced from time to time, whichever is shorter
- 17.4 An Animal Control Order pursuant to Subsection 17.1(b) may require the Owner of the Animal to do such things as the Animal Control Officer deems necessary, at the Owner's expense, including, without limitation, any or all of the following
- 18.1 Part 18 - Obstruction
- 18.2 Where an Animal Control Officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence under this Bylaw has been committed by a Person, the Animal Control Officer may require the name, address, and proof of identity of that Person
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of the public bylaw page. The city's page governs.