Kingston : Règlement no 2021-166, art. 18.2 — Where an Animal Control Officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence under this Bylaw has been committed by a Person, the Animal Control Officer may require the name, address, and proof of identity of that Person
Vérifié le
Texte indexé
Where an Animal Control Officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence under this Bylaw has been committed by a Person, the Animal Control Officer may require the name, address, and proof of identity of that Person.
Extrait court. Le reste du texte est sur la source officielle.
Source officielle · Table des matières
Sujets
Articles voisins
- 17.5 In accordance with Section 105 of the Municipal Act, 2001, if an Owner is required to Muzzle a Dog pursuant to Subsection 17.2 above, the Owner is entitled to request a hearing to determine whether or not to exempt the Owner in whole or in part from the requirement, provided that such request does not act as a stay of the Muzzling requirement
- 18.1 Part 18 - Obstruction
- 18.3 Failure to provide proof of identification satisfactory to an Animal Control Officer when requested to do so pursuant to Subsection 18.2. of this Bylaw shall constitute obstruction of an Animal Control Officer under Subsection 18.1. of this Bylaw
- 19.1 The following Schedules are attached to and form part of this Bylaw
Autres villes
Pour signaler une correction : info@bylawinsider.com. Ce lien ouvre votre programme de courriel.
Copie non officielle, pour faciliter la lecture. La version officielle prévaut. Source officielle
Short excerpts of the public bylaw page. The city's page governs.