Kingston : Règlement no 2021-166, art. 17.5 — In accordance with Section 105 of the Municipal Act, 2001, if an Owner is required to Muzzle a Dog pursuant to Subsection 17.2 above, the Owner is entitled to request a hearing to determine whether or not to exempt the Owner in whole or in part from the requirement, provided that such request does not act as a stay of the Muzzling requirement
Vérifié le
Texte indexé
In accordance with Section 105 of the Municipal Act, 2001, if an Owner is required to Muzzle a Dog pursuant to Subsection 17.2 above, the Owner is entitled to request a hearing to determine whether or not to exempt the Owner in whole or in part from the requirement, provided that such request does not act as a stay of the Muzzling requirement.
Extrait court. Le reste du texte est sur la source officielle.
Source officielle · Table des matières
Sujets
Articles voisins
- 17.3 An Animal Control Order pursuant to Subsection 17.1(a) shall be in effect for a period of no longer than two (2) years from the date it is issued, or the outcome of any court decisions rendered through the Dog Owners' Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D.16, as amended or replaced from time to time, whichever is shorter
- 17.4 An Animal Control Order pursuant to Subsection 17.1(b) may require the Owner of the Animal to do such things as the Animal Control Officer deems necessary, at the Owner's expense, including, without limitation, any or all of the following
- 18.1 Part 18 - Obstruction
- 18.2 Where an Animal Control Officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence under this Bylaw has been committed by a Person, the Animal Control Officer may require the name, address, and proof of identity of that Person
Autres villes
Pour signaler une correction : info@bylawinsider.com. Ce lien ouvre votre programme de courriel.
Copie non officielle, pour faciliter la lecture. La version officielle prévaut. Source officielle
Short excerpts of the public bylaw page. The city's page governs.