Markham By-law 2017-27, s. 9.1 — In addition to the minimum standards for the maintenance of a property, the Owner of an Abandoned Building shall protect the property against the risk of fire, storm, neglect intentional damage or damage by other causes by effectively preventing the entrance of the elements, unauthorized persons or the infestation of pests by boarding up and securing any openings to the Abandoned Building. For the purpose of securing an Abandoned Building provisions of subsection 8.3 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), and
Keep Markham Beautiful (Maintenance) By-law
Last checked
Indexed text
In addition to the minimum standards for the maintenance of a property, the Owner of an Abandoned Building shall protect the property against the risk of fire, storm, neglect intentional damage or damage by other causes by effectively preventing the entrance of the elements, unauthorized persons or the infestation of pests by boarding up and securing any openings to the Abandoned Building. For the purpose of securing an Abandoned Building provisions of subsection 8.3 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), and
- (j) must be complied with.
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Related sections
- 8.7 Where the minimum standard imposed by sections 8.3 and 8.5 has, more than once, failed to exclude unauthorized entry, and further where the Owner’s control, attendance or lack of security measures to protect the Vacant Heritage Property suggest that a more secure option be used, then the Owner shall supply such measures, including such improved security of closures, as may be required by a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer
- 9.0 Abandoned Building/Vacant Listed Heritage Property
- 9.2 In addition to the minimum standards for the maintenance of a property, the Owner of a Vacant Listed Heritage Property shall protect the Property against the risk of fire, storm, neglect, intentional damage or damage by other causes by effectively preventing the entrance of the elements, unauthorized persons or the infestation of pests by boarding up and securing any openings to the Vacant Listed Heritage Property. For the purpose of securing a Vacant Listed Heritage Property, provisions of subsection 8.3 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), (m), 8.4, 8.5 and 8.6
- 9.3 Where the minimum standard imposed by sections 8.3 and 8.5 has, more than once, failed to exclude unauthorized entry, and further where the Owner’s control, attendance or lack of security measures to protect the Vacant Listed Heritage Property suggest that a more secure option be used, then the Owner shall supply such measures, including such improved security of closures, as may be required by a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.