Markham By-law 2018-55, s. 10.1 — Instead of laying a charge under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c
Public Nuisances By-law
Last checked
Indexed text
Instead of laying a charge under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.
P. 33, as amended, for a breach of any provision of this By-law, an Order, a Work Order, or any other Order issued pursuant this By-law, an Officer may issue an administrative penalty to the Person who has contravened this By- law.
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Related sections
- 9.1 An Owner shall be presumed to have created, caused, allowed, permitted or continued a Public Nuisance that has occurred on the Owner’s Property, which presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary on a balance of probabilities
- 10.0 ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES
- 10.2 The Officer has the discretion to either proceed by way of an administrative penalty or a charge laid under the Provincial Offences Act. If an administrative penalty is issued to a Person for the breach, no charge shall be laid against that same Person for the same breach
- 10.3 The amount of the administrative penalty for a breach of a provision of this By-law, a Work Order or Order issued under this by-law is fixed as set out in By-Law No. 2016-84, A By-law to Implement an Administrative Monetary Penalty System for Non-Parking Offences, as amended, or any successor by- law
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.