Markham By-law 2023-164, s. 44 — The Officer has the discretion to either proceed by way of an Administrative Penalty or proceed under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 33, as amended
Tree Preservation By-law
Last checked
Indexed text
The Officer has the discretion to either proceed by way of an Administrative Penalty or proceed under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 33, as amended.
Short excerpt. The rest of the text is on the official source.
Official source · Table of contents
Topics
Related sections
- 42 The City may add any part of a fine or administration fee related to a provincial offence that is in default under Section 69 of the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O
- 43 Instead of laying a charge under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P
- 45 The amount of the Administrative Penalty for a breach of this By-law is fixed as set out in AMPS By-law for Non-Parking Offences 2016-84, as amended. A Person who is issued an Administrative Penalty shall be subject to the AMPS By-law for Non-Parking Offences 2016-84, as amended
- 46 An Administrative Penalty that is not paid within fifteen (15) days after the day it becomes due and payable constitutes a debt of the Person to the City and may be added to the tax roll and collected in the same manner as municipal taxes
Other cities
To report a correction: info@bylawinsider.com. This link opens your mail program.
Unofficial copy for convenience; the official version governs. Official source
Short excerpts of a public bylaw PDF. The official PDF governs.